Need an argumentative essay on A discussion for the course of Anthropology 101. Needs to be 3 pages. Please no plagiarism.
Anthropology has been used to raise arguments against sexual liberation, gender equality, post-colonial oppression and advocacy of cultural diversity, multiculturalism. The paper analyses the book of pushed into the rocks written by Florence shipek based on Indians land tenure in Southern California (Shipek, 1988).
For thousands of years in southern California, there lived four Indian national or tribal groups such as Cahuilla, San Luiseño, Kumeyaay, and Cupeno. Presently their land comprises of thirty-three small reservations, of which they all are the formerly vast aboriginal territories. Some Indian individuals possess their own land and live in urban areas or outside the reservation boundaries. Shipek traces the history of Indian land tenure in southern California from the contact period of pre-European to the present. The initial southern California was manifested by intensive land use because of the high population density that existed. The Indians worked hard in the environment by using fire to enhance cultivation of plant husbandry such as trees, squash, beans, corn, shrubs and onions. The author dismisses the popular belief that these people’s lives only depended on hunting and gathering (Shipek, 1988).
Shipek is one among the many outstanding anthropologists who go further to claim that, Indian land tenure from southern California was based on individual private ownership. The ownership comprised of individuals or families who owned the most subsistence sources. In addition, the property was inherited in a patrilineal manner and the ownership rights were not lost if the land remained unused. Shamans owned specific resources such as medicinal plants. Besides, each of the ethnic group owned several bands that were held in certain periods such as gatherings. The territorial boundaries were safeguarded against external aggression by both military and