Compose a 750 words essay on Sidneys and Freidbergs. Needs to be plagiarism free!
The sugar extraction was very complex and technical than what Europeans got used to, and ultimately resulting in sugar becoming food for the wealthy. During the 18th and 19th centuries, the sugar consumption rapidly rose in England resulting in sugar be seen as the necessity of the people regardless of the economic status.
In the entire article, Mintz emphasized the importance of the spread of sugar cane in a cultural and economic sense. In addition, he examined how sugar functioning developed and transformed over time. It began as medicine to sweetener to preservative and now the food is in the form of molasses.
In addition to the anthropological perspective, he looked at the historical meaning of sugar consumption. Mintz structured his article in chronological order by examining the sugar usage in each period. Initially, he suggested that he would examine the sugar cane usage though he argued that it would be hard to discuss it alone without involving other foods. Thus, the way he discussed foods, he pointed out that sugar cane gets linked with other foods that developed during diverse times revealing the world transformation.
The problem with this article is that Mintz went too far in connecting his data with the main point. For instance, he took an individual general statement about the focus of Europe on the New World and argued that it was as if the writer had sugar thoughts when writing it. According to me, I think Mintz’s thoughts were a great stretch, now that the author did not say anything about the sugar. Thus, he should not have presented it as a fact in his article.
Freidberg aims to show how the geographic perspective enriches the food’s historical analysis. He situates practices and norms in ecological and spatial contexts. The article examines the 20th-century food consumption history in Burkina Faso, specifically in Bobo-Dioulasso.