Complete an evaluation of each team member’s Individual program assignment using the QC sheet your team developed in Week Two.
The program to be evaluated and QC sheet are attached.
- Attachment 1
- Attachment 2
REV 3 Date 1 FEB 2016 Evaluator Name(s)Evaluation Date (MM/DD/YYYY)Evaluation Submission Date (MM/DD/YYYY)Program NameDeveloper Name(s)Program Revision Date (MM/DD/YYYY) Grade Scale: 0 – Unacceptable; 1 – Poor; 2 – Satisfactory; 3 – Good; 4 – ExcellentGrade Weight forcriterion Compilation: Does the code compile without errors? 0 15% Execution: Does the code execute without errors? 0 15% Meets Specification: Does the algorithm do what the 0 15% 0 15% 0 15% 0 5% 0 5% Identifiers: Do identifiers logically describe use? 0 5% Naming Conventions: Is there a consistent naming 0 5% 0 5% 0.00 100% Basic Standards Criteria assignment said it should do? Logic Quality: Is logic flow, such as the use of sequence, User Interaction selection, and repetition, in a clear, concise, and effectivemanner? UI Display: Are user inputs clearly marked on the screen?Are user outputs clearly displayed? Are there controlsincluded that are not being used? Validation: Are there checks for valid input type and dataformat? Are there boundary checks for data ranges? AreExceptions handled in a Try-Catch block effectively? Indentation: Is indentation used correctly to illustrate the Style structure of the program? convention? Comments: Do comments explain processing that is notobvious? Are there headers included? Cumulative Grade out of Max of 4.00 Comments 6 Scores01234 UnacceptablePoorSatisfactoryGoodExcellent