Complete an evaluation of each team member’s Individual program assignment using the QC sheet your team developed in Week Two. The program to be

Complete an evaluation of each team member’s Individual program assignment using the QC sheet your team developed in Week Two.

The program to be evaluated and QC sheet are attached.

  • Attachment 1
  • Attachment 2

REV 3 Date 1 FEB 2016 Evaluator Name(s)Evaluation Date (MM/DD/YYYY)Evaluation Submission Date (MM/DD/YYYY)Program NameDeveloper Name(s)Program Revision Date (MM/DD/YYYY) Grade Scale: 0 – Unacceptable; 1 – Poor; 2 – Satisfactory; 3 – Good; 4 – ExcellentGrade Weight forcriterion Compilation: Does the code compile without errors? 0 15% Execution: Does the code execute without errors? 0 15% Meets Specification: Does the algorithm do what the 0 15% 0 15% 0 15% 0 5% 0 5% Identifiers: Do identifiers logically describe use? 0 5% Naming Conventions: Is there a consistent naming 0 5% 0 5% 0.00 100% Basic Standards Criteria assignment said it should do? Logic Quality: Is logic flow, such as the use of sequence, User Interaction selection, and repetition, in a clear, concise, and effectivemanner? UI Display: Are user inputs clearly marked on the screen?Are user outputs clearly displayed? Are there controlsincluded that are not being used? Validation: Are there checks for valid input type and dataformat? Are there boundary checks for data ranges? AreExceptions handled in a Try-Catch block effectively? Indentation: Is indentation used correctly to illustrate the Style structure of the program? convention? Comments: Do comments explain processing that is notobvious? Are there headers included? Cumulative Grade out of Max of 4.00 Comments 6 Scores01234 UnacceptablePoorSatisfactoryGoodExcellent